pulled the fresnel lens out of the overhead projector and placed it on top of the scan bed. uh. i dont really know what i'm doing here. but i think??? that the fresnel might "correct" the light heading to the sensor? to maybe yield a more consistent exposure over the whole frame? shot one is with the fresnel facing in, second is with it facing out. in and out here relative to where the light comes from in the overhead projector since im attempting to reverse its optics for capturing images? uhhh im fairly certain the fresnel needs to be a set distance away from the scanner to actually "work" but its certainly Doing Something here. oh and all the crap on the photo is from the nasty plastic screen on the scanner itself, i'll remove it once i'm more confident with what i'm doing here.
that's much better. shooting at iso 12800 in the daylight
ehhh. the ones of nifty thru the fence and liz popping off at getting a honk from a truck turned out nice though (the thin depth of field makes me feel ill) (even though it looks Good) (remember when i used to like it? lol)
BEWARE
walm art
editing way lazy but maybe the better way to look at it is i'm sharpening my "edit quickly" skills
crushing out more detail
this area's in an 'extreme drought' i think
i would consider these shots somewhat hastily edited but i got what i wanted which is the skies having a full range of tones from black to white
next time i went back to https://streak.club/p/59903/words-places-by-999999999
someone added to the bit by smashing up the shelves and blocking off the door
ultra close crop on the lips one
Post a comment
@(: it really does... if i do remove it i will keep it around to be able to insert it back in
the plastic has The Vibe though