i think the removed modules in ART make it a no go, i get a lot of mileage out of the wavelet stuff. but ohhhhh it has so many little quality of life features that are sorely lacking in RT. also still had to load images into DT because I like its cropping tool way better and neither RT or ART can do framing and DT's framing tool is way better than GIMP or GMIC's at least for standard framing. yea. lotta software thoughts.
photos are from a friends concert recently. was rly cool
that's much better. shooting at iso 12800 in the daylight
ehhh. the ones of nifty thru the fence and liz popping off at getting a honk from a truck turned out nice though (the thin depth of field makes me feel ill) (even though it looks Good) (remember when i used to like it? lol)
BEWARE
walm art
editing way lazy but maybe the better way to look at it is i'm sharpening my "edit quickly" skills
crushing out more detail
this area's in an 'extreme drought' i think
i would consider these shots somewhat hastily edited but i got what i wanted which is the skies having a full range of tones from black to white
next time i went back to https://streak.club/p/59903/words-places-by-999999999
someone added to the bit by smashing up the shelves and blocking off the door
ultra close crop on the lips one
Post a comment