I photographed a rave with a full manual (including focus) setup. My keeper rate was uhhh........... quite small.
that's much better. shooting at iso 12800 in the daylight
ehhh. the ones of nifty thru the fence and liz popping off at getting a honk from a truck turned out nice though (the thin depth of field makes me feel ill) (even though it looks Good) (remember when i used to like it? lol)
BEWARE
walm art
editing way lazy but maybe the better way to look at it is i'm sharpening my "edit quickly" skills
crushing out more detail
this area's in an 'extreme drought' i think
i would consider these shots somewhat hastily edited but i got what i wanted which is the skies having a full range of tones from black to white
next time i went back to https://streak.club/p/59903/words-places-by-999999999
someone added to the bit by smashing up the shelves and blocking off the door
ultra close crop on the lips one
Post a comment
@(: I did end up "discovering" this for myself over the night, ended up basically zone focusing and raising ISO to shoot at like f5.6, by the end of it I realized I was kinda just canceling out any advantage the full frame sensor was giving me in the low light :P so all the shots that were acceptably in focus also have little to no subject background separation oopsie (i did take a thousand images though, so even with a low keeper rate the # of keepers is absolutely okay for what I was doing /shrug)
a classic street photography technique was to preset the focus at a fixed distance (say, focus at 5 meters with a decent depth of field) in order to take pictures very quickly without focusing. idk if that would even work in the context you were in, sharing for the curiosity factor
(this picture is neat too)